Sunday, February 18, 2018

1) Papuan Liberation Movement hopeful over MSG process


2) The strategic holiday is over (part 1)
3) Indonesia stock exchange targets 2 thousand investors from W Papua
4) BPS: Papua Exports Drop 50.80 Percent
------------------


https://www.radionz.co.nz/international/pacific-news/350686/papuan-liberation-movement-hopeful-over-msg-process
1) Papuan Liberation Movement hopeful over MSG process
6:40 am today 
MSG leaders meeting in Port Moresby last week referred the Movement's application to the MSG secretariat for processing under new membership guidelines.
The Movement already has observer status but MSG leaders have been divided on whether to allow it full membership.
The chairman of the Movement, Benny Wenda, said he remained hopeful.
"I want to send my people a message to my people back home that this is another positive.
"Step by step, we are in the right dircetion, so please pray. We hope that the secretariat will discuss our application very soon, because we are dreaming to become full member," he said.



--------------------------------------

https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/strategic-holiday-part-1/
2) The strategic holiday is over (part 1)
6 Feb 2018|
The release of the Trump administration’s 2018 national defence strategy (NDS) in January highlighted a more dangerous threat environment with an assertive China and aggressive Russia at the top of US concerns. The document states that ‘it is increasingly clear that China and Russia want to shape a world consistent with their authoritarian model—gaining veto authority over other nations’ economic, diplomatic and security decisions’. China and Russia are certain to push back against the new US strategy, and thus the stage is set for a new period of major-power competition akin to the Cold War.
The US plans to enhance cooperation globally by developing ‘an extended network [of allies] capable of deterring or decisively acting to meet shared challenges of our time’. It also wants to reinforce ‘collaborative planning and deepen interoperability in a manner that could also include supporting foreign partner capability development to ensure an ability to integrate with US forces’. In the Indo-Pacific region, the US says it will build ‘a networked security architecture capable of deterring aggression, maintaining stability, and ensuring free access to common domains’ and ‘bring together bilateral and multilateral security relationships to preserve a free and open international system’.
Australia must quickly respond by talking to Washington about US expectations of its allies. We can’t afford to send mixed signals like we did recently, with defence minister Marise Payne supportive of the NDS one day, and foreign minister Julie Bishop distancingAustralia from its key message the next. Our policy on the alliance has to be coherent and robust. The government should explore ways to strengthen the US–Australia alliance that enhance the likelihood of the NDS’s success and, at the same time, improve Australia’s security in a more contested environment.
The NDS refers to developing more survivable and dispersed basing arrangements in the face of a Chinese anti-access and area denial (A2AD) capability that’s increasingly long-range, accurate and responsive. Our contribution to that effort could include giving the US more access to Australian military facilities. For example, we could offer the US Navy home porting rights in Fleet Base West, and expand the enhanced air cooperation component of the US–Australia Force Posture Initiatives to a sustained presence, rather than only short-term rotations. That would enhance the survivability of US forces in the face of Chinese A2AD in East Asia, and reinforce extended deterrence below the nuclear threshold. It would also contribute to a more credible strategic deterrence posture for the US against China overall.
Strengthening our alliance arrangements will require us to discriminate between critical security interests and secondary concerns. If we’re going to help build the webs between the spokes in the ‘hub and spokes’ security arrangements, we must be careful to avoid commitments in which there’s a mismatch between our interests and the risks involved. That may call for some hard-headed choices about where, when and what we contribute. Making those decisions may be the most challenging aspect of developing a higher defence profile in Asia.
The Turnbull government has recently made good progress in facilitating closer defence relations with Japan, and is once again supporting a revival of the US–Japan–India–Australia ‘quadrilateral’ dialogue. These diplomatic efforts suggest useful pathways to playing a greater security role in Asia alongside the United States. But they do carry risks. We must not be naive about building ties that bind. We have to distinguish carefully between partners we want to cooperate with and those we seek a closer alliance with, because the latter group potentially entails defence obligations. These strategic conundrums aren’t new, but they’re becoming more acute and will force Australia to engage in a more mature strategic debate in more adverse circumstances. Our strategic holiday is coming to an end.
Indonesia also must, of course, be a priority for Australian defence diplomacy because it sits in the maritime fulcrum of the Indo-Pacific region, astride vital sea lanes and maritime straits. If China is to dominate Southeast Asia through the South China Sea, it ultimately must control Indonesian waters as well. The territorial dispute over Indonesia’s exclusive economic zone around the Natuna Islands, and China’s declared ‘nine-dash line’ which overlaps that zone, is likely to be a focal point for future crisis in Indonesian–Chinese relations.
Maintaining our strategic partnership with Indonesia is important because, as Stephan Fruehling noted recently, unless China gains access to, or control of, bases in Indonesia (as Japan did in 1942), the strategic geography makes it much harder for China to threaten Australia directly, at least in a sustained and substantial way. We should work alongside the US to boost Indonesian naval capabilities because a more powerful Indonesia that’s able to resist Chinese pressure on the high seas in turn limits Chinese territorial ambitions.
Taking on greater defence burden-sharing in Asia to support the US and counterbalance China will have significant defence capability and budget implications. I’ll consider those issues in my next post.

Malcolm Davis is a senior analyst at ASPI


-------------------------------------


https://en.antaranews.com/news/114677/indonesia-stock-exchange-targets-2-thousand-investors-from-w-papua
3) Indonesia stock exchange targets 2 thousand investors from W Papua
Reporter:  

Manokwari, W Papua (ANTARA News) - The Indonesia Stock Exchange (BEI) has set a target of an increase of 2 thousand investors from West Papua Province by 2018.

Head of BEI Office of Manokwari, Adevi Sabath, said during a media gathering in Manokwari, the capital of the province, on Saturday that the number of investors in West Papua shares in 2017 reached 906 people.

In January 2018, the number increased to 956 people. Sabath stated that the office will work optimally to encourage more people to invest through securities offices under the BEI.

According to Sabath, only the cities of Manokwari and Sorong dominated the number of investors from the province. In other areas of the province, the number of investors was not significant enough.

"We are still expanding campaign and literacy programs by targeting various circles, from students to communities," Sabath stated.

He remarked that there are only five investment galleries currently formed, which were in the University of Papua and Institute of Economic Science of Mah-Eisa in Manokwari city, and in Viktoria University, Institute of Economic Science of Bukit Zaitun, and University of Muhammadiyah in Sorong city.

In addition to providing services in the investment galleries, the Monokwari`s BEI Office is carrying out educational training for the community of motorcycle drivers. 

"We see that the communities have quite high interest in investing their capital. Recently, many people in the areas were deceived while investing their capital," Sabath explained.

Reindhra Nadyarian Artika Putri, the Manokwari`s Indo Premier Representative Officer, was optimistic that the investors` transaction value in West Papua Province will increase in 2018.

"In 2019, from 285 investors, the transaction value reached Rp11.9 billion. In February 2018, from 35 investors, the transaction value reached Rp3.5 billion," Putri revealed.

Putri believed that the value of stock purchase transactions until the end of December 2018 would be much larger than last year.

Reported by Toyiban
(T.M052/A/KR-BSR/S012) 
Editor: Heru Purwanto
—————————————


SUNDAY, 18 FEBRUARY, 2018 | 16:36 WIB
4) BPS: Papua Exports Drop 50.80 Percent

TEMPO.COJakarta - Statistics Central Agency (BPS) of Papua Province revealed that Papua exports in January 2018 plummeted up to 50.80 percent or from US$ 536.72 million in Desember 2017 to US$ 264.49 million.
Papua BPS head Simon Sapary in Jayapura on Sunday (18/2) explained that the drop was triggered by the decrease of export commodity copper ore and concentrate (HS26) to 50.81 percent.
"The export value of HS26 was recorded to reach US$ 260.45 million or dropped 50.81 percent compared to that of the previous month reaching US$ 529.45 million," he said.
For wood and wooden products (HS44) in which the main commodity is plywood, the export decreased as much as US$ 4.77 million or 60.62 percent.
Meanwhile, other non-oil and gas commodities went up to 218.75 percent including tires for industrial or construction vehicles (75.28 percent), cigarettes(3.20 percent), and electronic audio accessories (2.35 percent).
ANTARA
----------------------------

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.